Previous Posts

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

New FanDuel Contest Format Alert: The “Head to Head Matrix”

Challenge me at FanDuel!

My FAQ on FanDuel.

New Contest Format Alert: The “Head to Head Matrix”

From the FanDuel blog:

"We’re pleased to announce the launch of a new contest format on FanDuel.  The “Head to Head Matrix” format contests essentially package a group of twenty smaller head to head contests in one entry.  If you enter a $25, 21 person H2H Matrix, you will be facing twenty unique opponents in a contest where the prize structure exactly mimics the payouts that you’d receive if you played each of those twenty people in a $1.25 head to head contest.  Similarly, 21 person H2H matrix contests at other buy-ins simulate playing head to head contests against 20 opponents, each for 1/20th of the Matrix entry fee.
We will initially be offering H2H Matrix contests in NFL (ranging from $5 to $50 entry fee) and in NBA (ranging from $5 to $25 entry fee) and will potentially add other sports and buy-in levels once we see how the initial contests go.

Sounds like a new way to get some fantasy action without going all-in or reaching for the stars in a tournament. Let me know if you join a H2H Matrix, and I'll join up and play!

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

My first take on one-day fantasy leagues at FanDuel.

I used FanDuel for the first time the other day after growing increasingly more irritated at losing in fantasy from the random players getting hurt or getting caught doing stupid things. I'm not thrilled at my standard fantasy football teams this year, so I'm taking my research and heading to FanDuel while hoping for waiver wire magic.

Depositing cash is easy, and done with Paypal, Visa, Mastercard, or Amex. I'm pretty sure they have a money-back guarantee if something crazy happens, and I've seen nothing but good reviews on payouts. Turns out, daily fantasy isn't the same as organized sports betting in the eyes of Uncle Sam.


After signing up with a modest amount of dough, I'm let loose into this website and felt my head start spinning:
The business end of FanDuel.
Nice, clean website with quality coding. Each page loads quickly, and the current number of entrants tends to update very quickly.

So, once you get here, it's time to join a game. There are a few different varieties of games:

50/50 - The best type in my opinion. Pick a team and take on other players to see who can pick an above-average team. If the league has 20 players, the top ten double their money (minus the rake). Simple, yet effective.

Head-to-Head - You can either pick a match-up or offer a match-up based on the sport, time and prize money. The site will then fill out most open match-ups, or you can just choose who you want to play against. User names are seen on these, so for those who want to play against 1ucror or Condia, this is the best way to get it done. Also, playing friends head to head for cash sounds freaking awesome.

Tournaments - These are the best "buy-in-to-winnings" ratio games available on FanDuel. Unfortunately, since you're playing against large amounts of players, the top 10% or so make money while the rest lose out. If you feel like you know some true sleepers, a tournament lineup with a few home run hitters could land you a lot of cash for a little bit of capital. Obviously, more losses will occur in tournaments, so mediocre teams have no chance of winning. Go big or go home in tournaments.

Winner-take-alls - Simply put, the winner takes all the money. Some winner-take-all games have five players, some ten, some a random number, but the pay-out is sweet for the winner. A winner of a $5, 10-team winner-take-all nets $45! I'd be willing to put five dollars each week on my fantasy team being the best of ten people, and it seems like a great way to have weekly fantasy with your friends instead of a year-long league. 

Double-up, Triple-up, Quadruple-ups - These are tourneys set up to allow the winners to double, triple, or quadruple their entry fees. There are more players than in 50/50 or winner-take-alls, but the payout is truly double, triple or quadruple AFTER the rake. 

All games at the low buy-in level have a 10% rake. For example, winning a $1 Head-to-Head would net you 80 cents ($1 buy-in plus $1 for victory equals $2, but with a 10% rake you get $1.80). This is obviously pretty standard in betting of all types. I find it pretty acceptable to spend a small amount to keep the website up and running in quality fashion. I've also heard the big games have a smaller rake, but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.)

Some games take place over specific time periods, like Sunday-only NFL or late-night NBA. Most leagues are just one day, so you can do research on one day's worth of games as opposed to a full season. Forget trying to guess 16 weeks of NFL, just get one week right and you're in the money.

I started with some late-night NBA, and you're given a list of games to choose players from. Each game is salary-cap based, so you start with, say, $65k, and each player costs an amount relative to their scoring potential. High point scorers are given the highest salary, and bargains can be found when those big names are hurt. 

Obviously, you can't just play the best players in the NBA each night. Players like Kevin Durant cost around $10k, so you'll end up needing to fill out the roster with sleepers and bench players.

A line-up selection screen on FanDuel for Thanksgiving NFL games. Note the price difference between Peyton and Philip Rivers, or Jamaal Charles and Matt Forte.
After setting your lineup, you can change the lineup any time before the tournament starts. This helps you make sure that if you make a mistake, you can change it quickly and not get burned.

When you fill out a lineup, you can choose to play your lineup in other games if you think it's an ultimate team. Some users choose to play many different lineups, but I'm cool with one good one. Choosing different opponents will probably lead to a better range of results.


Rules and scoring are very similar to a "standard league" in fantasy terms. Bonuses for yardage are not included as far as I know, so the scoring is pure. The NFL scoring includes half a point per reception, so make sure to think in PPR terms. The rules and scoring page is a pretty good read, and can be seen here

So, since I've won a few and lost a few, I'm sitting on a similar bankroll to where I started. Here's hoping that with time, effort, and experience, I can turn my small victories into larger wins and begin my run to become the next Condia. Who is Condia? Just sit in the chat room for a few seconds, or click that link. Basically, Condia is the guy playing tons of games and moving a bunch of money in these sites every day. Some think he's a robot, others think he's the man, but he sure does win a lot.

If you feel like giving FanDuel a try, here's a link to sign up. Come find me (username: siderealdaze) and see if you can take my money!

No, I didn't die, but my fantasy teams sure did.

In the last few years, I've murdered fantasy football in the same way that...well, a murderer murders things. I've also had very little going on in my professional and personal life outside of the normal doings of a late 20's slacker, so taking time to set a perfect line-up seemed pretty easy.

This year, I planned on spending the same amount of time on fantasy sports while adding a few hours a week for writing about the subject. Turns out, I've been busy as hell in real life working for a radio station/website in Chapel Hill, shooting photos at UNC Football, and working whatever other hours I have left at Jimmy John's for some money and subs.

I've had a few things each week that I wanted to share with the fantasy sports world, but finding time to research fantasy sports AND write about it has been tough. I'm in five leagues, and I am exactly one game over .500, and no more than one game over .500 in any league.

I AM TRULY MEDIOCRE.

This guy was so tired from fantasy research, he spelled Michael Jordan J-O-R-D-E-N. True story.

Timing is everything in fantasy sports, as well. An article about busts or sleepers really doesn't do much good at 1:01 PM each Sunday, much less a few days later. I've noticed that it is nearly impossible to write for free AND for a deadline...I think human minds are just unable to make it happen. Call it writer's block if you want.

So, after going for about ten weeks since my last post, I'm here to post...something.

In a $50 buy-in league, I had Aaron Rodgers, Julio Jones, Justin Blackmon, and Kyle Rudolph all go down. Add to the silly scoring from that league, and I went from sure-fire money winner to probably not making the playoffs.

Every fantasy team has it's ups and downs, but this is ridiculous. My RBs are Trent Richardson and Stevan Ridley, who I've had to keep because of my weekly waiver-wire scavenging. Each week, I've had to replace another starter that went down for whatever reason, and each bye week seems to just ravage my starting lineup.

So, yeah, had I picked Jimmy Graham in the first, second or third round (and I had the research to back it up) and picked literally anyone but Julio, Stevan or Trent with those picks, I'd be hanging out. Right now, my lineup looks like this:

This lineup sucks.
Turns out that every week, I missed out on the players I needed to fill holes (Julius Thomas, Zac Stacy, etc) because my team was either too good to be low on the waiver priority, or I'd spent my waiver wire priority patching another hole from some mysterious, random blow to my team.

Having done the same research for all my fantasy teams, the Julio Jones injury has hurt the most. I owned him in every league, and in every league have struggled to make a dollar out of fifteen cents with the remaining players weeks into a fantasy season. 

So, now that I'm stuck trying to make fantasy teams competitive that can't score, I'm doing a slightly different form of research for my picks. I'm spending a huge amount of time normally left for making my DTV antenna work or ordering a pizza on finding low-risk, high-reward players that are somehow under the radar.

See my lineup for proof- I've scored Coby Fleener, Kendall Wright, and Nick Foles in order to make my team somewhat respectable. Fleener was an obvious choice after the dude Allen from Clemson went out for the season. Kendall Wright is a true possession receiver and has had multiple receptions each week, never less than 50 yards or so. Nick Foles just happens to play on a REALLY up-tempo passing offense and have prototypical skills.

Where this is different from winning teams' selections, is the uncertainty. I'm always putting Calvin Johnson in if he's alive, period. Same goes with Drew Brees, or Brandon Marshall, or the Seahawks D. Players in the first few rounds of drafts and on top of leader boards tend to have less possibility of performing poorly and tend to have consistent results.

These are proven fantasy performers that barely have bad games. Simple, right?

It isn't so simple, even for the experts. This year was the year of the running back in most leagues, and I don't need to try hard in order to list the disappointments found in first rounds all over America. C.J. Spiller was a one-way ticket to the fantasy outhouse. It seems crazy right now to think that Frank Gore went in later rounds than Trent Richardson, or that Danny Woodhead and Knowshon Moreno are winning fantasy weeks for owners basically by themselves. 

What doesn't seem crazy, is that some examples of 2013 fantasy busts are NOT "proven fantasy performers that barely have bad games".

Trent Richardson had plenty of slow games for the Browns, but I chased the handful of runs shown on ESPN that made him look like the unstoppable bowling ball he was in the NCAA. Same goes for Kyle Rudolph- I knew he was inconsistent, but fantasy football commercials and the "young-QB-safety-blanket" rhetoric made me feel secure. 

Boy, it sucks to be wrong in gambling.

Even though I've had these mis-hits and poor decisions on my teams, I've still managed to do okay. The same logic that brought me to get Julio Jones (receptions in the NFL at the time of his injury) made me feel comfortable rolling the dice on Desean Jackson and Vincent Jackson. I drafted the Seahawks' defense really early in every league, and have reaped the benefits of a team that clearly pushes the limits of competitive advantage. 

Basically, I know what I'm doing. 

I can't help it if a collarbone decides to break, or an ACL decides to tear. Injuries are, at this level of sport, nearly completely random. The coaching staff does not know or care about the one reception I need to beat my opponent. 

The second-guessing that comes with a bad fantasy season isn't worth it. I now understand that I didn't make the wrong decisions, I just guessed incorrectly. 

It's my moment of fantasy Zen.

So, until next week, I'll be eating Thanksgiving leftovers, trying to find that next hit of ZacStacy that will have my opponent sweating. 



Monday, September 9, 2013

2013 NFL Week 1 "The Good, the Bad and the Funny"

We're eschewing the usual format of "the Good, Bad, and the Ugly" in order to shed light on some hilarious stuff that happens each week with the NFL and fantasy football in particular.

Good:


  • Peyton Manning - About 50 points in most fantasy leagues and a new commercial where he claims that QB Sneak plays are "his thing". Awesome.
  • Adrian Peterson - All Day busted out a huge run to start the game and added two more touchdowns to make the consensus #1 overall pick of each draft this year worth every penny.
  • Anquan Boldin - Made me feel like a dumb-ass all day for not drafting him. Who the hell else is going to catch Kaepernick lasers? I forgot he was tight-end strong and wide-receiver fast. Green Bay sure did, too.
    Victor Cruz | New York Giants
  • Victor Cruz - The touchdown passes he caught exhibited toughness from a guy that still doesn't look that big. Victor Cruz takes a pounding and doesn't drop the football. If he was Megatron's size...he's probably be Megatron. Looks like he's still a threat for massive fantasy production. Last night, Cruz took a massive hit after a touchdown catch and hopped up into a salsa dance the next second. I love this guy.
  • Brian Hartline - HOMER ALERT! Dolphins won yesterday, and Hartline matched his TD total from last year while going over 100 yards. This is excellent news for Dolphins fans and deep fantasy league players that skimped on wide receivers this year.
  • TWO MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES! OMG! WTF!


Bad:


  • Clay Matthews - His non-ejection was ridiculous! A clearly out-of-bounds neck tackle on a QB and instigating a shoving match seemed like a pair of personal fouls to me, and I'm pretty sure that would warrant ejection in the new-look NFL. I like Matthews' intensity, but I feel like a less popular player would have gotten the boot.
  • DirecTV website (via Madden 25 deal) - This bad boy went down for nearly the entire first half after looking so promising in my living room at about 12:55. If it was my account we were using, I'd have been pretty pissed, but instead I went with good ole streaming videos full of pop-up ads. Hopefully this is fixed by next week, or some people's heads might explode.
  • Pittsburgh Steelers - Pittsburgh lost Pouncey and two other starters for the year, and barely managed a garbage-time touchdown after really struggling to move the ball against Tennessee. If not for the other three teams in their division losing in Week 1 as well, Steelers fans would have a lot to worry about. Hey, at least the Pirates are winners this year!
  • Stevan Ridley - I drafted this dude really high in a few leagues and felt robbed watching Shane Vereen play mistake-free football en route to the numbers I expected from Ridley. Vereen broke a bone in his wrist, so Ridley gets another chance this week to make good in the Hood(ie), but if he drops another turd in Week 2, I'm selling. 
  • David Wilson - Same thing with David Wilson. Two fumbles led to him bench-warming the majority of last night's game vs. the Cowboys, and after Andre Brown went down, I thought I had a true fantasy steal. Like Ridley, he's going to get another shot, but I assume that any fumbles will lead to benching and an overall destruction of Wilson's fantasy value.
  • Jacoby Jones commercial - Didn't see it 500 times in a row this Sunday while watching the aforementioned DirecTV website? Just replay this video all day today and you'll get the Sunday Ticket experience.

Funny:


  • Three Safeties - Three safeties happened within a few minutes of kickoff, and apparently this hasn't happened in one week since 1999. Last year, only 13 safeties occured all regular season.
  • The Jets won! - Somehow, the seemingly worst team in football won a game with Geno Smith looking competent and Rex Ryan coaching 'em up at the very end. Let's not worry about the dumb-ass play by the Bucs at the end of the game...this was a totally unpredictable result.
  • FARVA! - I'm pretty sure this is Farva of Super Troopers fame on this Windows 8 Tablet ad. See for yourself, and let me know if I am seeing things.





  • Jaguars being so terrible - Chad Henne played. 'Nuff said.


Hit me on twitter @it_is_elliott or in the comments section.

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Three 2013 NFL Fantasy Draft Observations


In a world of fantasy gurus and Top 10 lists, I’m looking to bring something to the fantasy discussion beyond simply quoting predictions and point averages. In the past week, I've completed five fantasy drafts ranging from cash-based live drafts to an experimental auction/FAAB format and have seen some trends that I find interesting.

1.       People freaking out over running backs

I haven’t seen a single draft list that didn't start with at least five or six RBs, and a few have had only one or two non-RBs listed in the top 15. I personally drafted a RB with each one of my initial picks (including paying $41 for Stevan Ridley in auction format) because some serious values at WR and TE were coming in the second and third rounds. You almost can’t draft any other position because of the available talent in the later rounds at FLEX/QB/WHATEVER and the dearth of talent at RB beyond the first 15 picks.


Adrian Peterson However, people seemed to keep leaving sure-fire studs on the board in lieu of drafting the next best RB. In my humble opinion, this was a total freak-out move. I’m sorry, but you can’t tell me that the historically volatile Mike Shanahan backfield forerunner (PUN INTENDED) Alfred Morris is going to be a better contributor ON AVERAGE than an elite WR available at the same position. Same thing goes with most second-tier RB1s.


 In one league, I was able to bracket picks at the end/beginning of a draft like this:

First Pick (#1 overall) – Adrian Peterson (Who’s more deserving than AD? Doug Martin? Beast Mode? Arian Foster? Get real.)
Second Pick (#16 overall) – A.J. Green, WR of awesome talent.
Third Pick (#17 overall) – Jimmy Graham, #1 TE by leaps and bounds and any other cliché distance .

A.J. Green is an absolute beast, and Jimmy Graham THIS YEAR at #17? Keep reading, please.

2.        Here’s why that was an absolute steal: TE is the position with the biggest drop-off from elite talent to mediocre talent.
I’ll just say it again, so those who bargain-shopped their TE slot can feel even worse about their draft:
TE is the position with the biggest drop-off from elite talent to mediocre talent.

Don’t believe me? I planned to go into this further in another article, so I’m just going to be quick here. I would say with confidence that Jimmy Graham is a much larger upgrade than the next available TE, and after that, the difference is even more severe. Here’s the skinny:

Jimmy Graham’s projected points in 2013 (according to Yahoo!):               179
Rob Gronkowski’s projected points in 2013:                                              158
The next best (T. Gonzalez, J. Witten, V. Davis):                                         140, 134, 119

Gronk is slated to score about the same amount of points per game as Graham, but probably won’t start in a full role and would be an obvious roster hole for at least the first week. After that, we’re looking at three players that will likely score at a much lower rate. Those players are getting you approximately 70% or less of the weekly production that one of the two elites would give you.

For comparison, here’s the top five RBs and their respective projections:

Peterson                                                                                                     266
Foster                                                                                                         254        
Spiller, Martin, Charles                                                                                239, 237, 229

Obviously, Peterson and Foster are safe picks (barring injury) and the next three are pretty close to each other in terms of projected points. The drop-off after the top five is pretty negligible, however. You have to go all the way down to the #15 RB (Frank Gore at this point in history) to get to a point of 70% production.

This doesn’t mean that Jimmy Graham in the first round of a 10-team league was a steal, either. Running backs that project up to 90% of the production of the OVERALL BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE are still draft-able late in the first or early in the second rounds. Taking Graham this early would take you out of the top running backs AND at least one #1 WR, and there’s no guarantee he wouldn’t have been available in the second or third round. In hindsight, I would have taken him third round every single time.

3.       Auctions are 156 times better than snake drafts.
I have started an auction league every year since reading a Bill Simmons mailbag entry about auction superiority. Quite simply, it kicks ass. Instead of having to watch the same troupe of first round picks, each fantasy manager gets to nominate a player and then bid an imaginary (or real) amount of money depending on a ton of criteria. The bidding wars and strategy involved with such wide-open auctioning are constant; the second-guessing and well-wishing after the draft are even worse than before. I’m not here to explain the rules, but I can tell you first hand that everyone goes crazy for an auction once they try it. It’s even more addictive than telling your normal friends about meaningless fantasy stats! I recommend doing this with your boring-ass work league as soon as possible.


I noticed a bunch of other things, but some of those are either covered by ESPN or other professional writers. I’m available for discussion about 14/6 of 24/7 in a week at @it_is_elliott on Twitter or in real life somewhere in Chapel Hill, NC. Any angry rants or questions are welcome in the comments section.                      

Sunday, December 25, 2011

If Fantasy Football existed in 1984 - Dan Marino's Amazing Season (2011 archive)

2013 UPDATE: (I found this and thought I would post it just so we could see how far things have come in even a few years regarding the passing game in the NFL. this article is now so far from being relevant it's not funny. Many QBs have passed Marino's former record for yards in a season, and Aaron Rodgers' backup on the last game of 2011, Matt Flynn, stole his production in Week 17 en route to a lot of money for almost zero production.)

Definitely not about to scramble for a first down.
My dad has been a Dolphins fan for his entire life, and in 1984, Dan Marino had an unreal season en route to a Super Bowl matchup and two sickening passing records - 5084 passing yards in a season (still standing) and 48 touchdown passes in a season (held by Tom Brady in 2007 - 50!).

Since modern fantasy football rules didn't exist until the late 80's, chances are my dad and his buddies weren't coveting "ownership" of Dan Marino, and they definitely weren't watching his games live on phones at Thanksgiving (sorry, everyone who didn't sit near me at the table this year).

While researching for this topic, I looked at years in which Dan's records were challenged or broken. These included Drew Brees' in 2008, Tom Brady in 2007, Peyton Manning in 2004, and Aaron Rodgers in 2011 for comparison.
(Click each year for statistical analysis). 

I also left out analysis of fumbles lost, because data for this is not available for every game since 1984. I'd assume the difference would be marginal anyhow. In short, those have each been outstanding seasons from a Fantasy Football standpoint.

Consider Dan Marino's 1984 season stats for a second:

Marino 1984: 5084 passing yards - 48 passing TD - 17 INT - (-7 rush yards):

Since rotisserie football is not very popular, looking at individual game scores and adding them together would have given a more accurate reading of fantasy points. To adjust for this, I would add 2 points for 300 yard passing games and 5 points for 400 yard passing games with each game only getting one or the other (i.e., only five points for a 400 yard game as opposed to six). This seems fair, as many fantasy leagues offer bonuses much more robust than these. These adjusted game averages are listed in RED LETTERS.

Here's the breakdown in terms of fantasy points (scoring based on Yahoo! Fantasy standard league scoring)
(passing numbers rounded to increments of 25 yards, best values are shown in bold text)

Marino 1984: 5084 passing yards - 48 passing TD - 17 INT - (-7 rush yards):
        (5075/25) + (48*4) - 17 = 378 points/16 games = 23.6 fantasy points per game (25.1 adjusted)

Manning 2004*: 4557 passing yards - 49 passing TD - 10 INT - 38 rush yards :
        (4550/25) + (49*4) - 10 + 3 = 371 points/16 games = 23.2 fppg (24.1 adjusted)
(stats are for ALL 16 games; on January 1, 2005, Manning was 1-2 for six yards in a meaningless game @ Denver in Week 17. This is significant, because Week 17 is often a Fantasy League Super Bowl week. This alone would hurt Manning's overall value from 2004 considerably if taken in terms of aiding league championships)

Brady 2007*: 4806 passing yards - 50 passing TD - 8 INT - 98 rush yards - 2 rush TD :
        (4800/25) + (50*4) - 8 + 9 + (2*6) = 405 points/16 games = 25.3 fppg (25.8 adjusted)
(on October 28, 2007, Brady threw for 306 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT, and rushed for 2 TD. 36 points in a standard league is sick)

Brees 2008*: 5069 passing yards - 34 passing TD - 17 INT - (-1 rush yard) :
        (5050/25) + (34*4) - 17 = 338 points/16 games = 21.1 fppg (22.3 adjusted)
(I watched a Saints WR drop the last pass of a game which would have pushed Brees past Marino for total passing yards in a season. I've never cheered so hard for a meaningless drop in my life)

Rodgers 2011*: 3475 passing yards - 33 passing TD - 4 INT - 175 rush yards - 2 rush TD :
        (3475/25) + (33*4) - 4 + 17 + (2*6) = 296 points/11 games = 26.9 fppg (27.9 adjusted)
(Rodgers' unreal numbers are likely to slip during the last five games. Even though his schedule is cupcake-laden, cold weather induces dropped passes, interceptions, and poor field conditions. Many of the YAC touchdowns this year from Rodgers might not make it as far in sub-zero conditions)

With adjusted values taken into play, Aaron Rodgers is having the sickest fantasy year in history.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Week 11 NFL Inactives

Key Inactives: 

Bengals WR A.J. Green (doubtful)
Browns S T.J. Ward
Chargers WR Malcom Floyd
Chiefs QB Matt Cassel
Cowboys WR Miles Austin
Eagles CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie
Eagles WR Jeremy Maclin
Giants RB Ahmad Bradshaw
Lions RB Jahvid Best
Patriots LB Brandon Spikes
Raiders RB Darren McFadden
Ravens LB Ray Lewis


For the NFL list of Inactives (updated until gametime) click on the link below:

NFL.com Injury List (this is what I use)